Accounting standards and measurement criteria
For accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, the IASB has amended IAS 1, providing guidelines and examples to assist entities in applying the concept of materiality to disclosures on the accounting policies adopted. The IASB also amended the IFRS Practice Statement 2 to support these amendments to IAS 1, explaining and demonstrating application of the “four step materiality process” to the accounting policy disclosure.
The amendments are intended to help entities provide more useful information about the accounting policies adopted, by:
- Replacing the requirement for entities to provide information on their “significant” accounting policies with the requirement to focus on their “material” accounting policies; and
- Adding guidelines on how entities should apply the materiality concept when making decisions about the disclosure on accounting policies adopted.
The replacement of disclosures on “significant” accounting policies with “material” policies in IAS 1 and the corresponding new guidelines in IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 may impact the disclosures on accounting policies prepared by entities. Determining whether accounting policies adopted are material or not requires greater use of professional judgement. The Acea Group has considered these amendments and has begun a gradual process of reviewing the information provided in the financial statements with reference to the material policies applied, also in the light of the varying nature of the parties that may potentially be interested in reading and understanding the information included in this document.
Material policies and criteria are illustrated below.
In accordance with the provisions of IFRS 15 “Revenue from contracts with customers”, revenues are recognised for an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity believes it is entitled in exchange for the transfer of goods or services to the customer. The fundamental parts for accounting purposes are:
- identify the commercial contract, defined as a (written or verbal) agreement between two or more parties which results in rights and obligations with the customer having the right to legal protection;
- identify the separately identifiable obligations to do something (also “performance obligations”) contained in the contract;
- determine the price of the transaction, as the fee the enterprise expects to receive for the transfer of assets or the performance of services to the customer, in accordance with the techniques in the Standard and depending on the possible presence of financial and variable components;
- allocate a price to each performance obligation;
- to recognize the revenue when the revenue obligation is fulfilled by the entity, allowing for the fact that the services may not be provided at a specific time, but over a period of time.
In a construction contract, revenue is recognised over time, using the input method, which measures the performance obligation based on the percentage of completion. When the amount invoiced exceeds total revenues recognised, a contract liability is recognised or, in the opposite case, a contract asset.
With reference to measuring revenues, note in particular that:
- revenues from the sale and transport of electricity and gas are recognised at the time the service is supplied or supplied, even if they are not invoiced, and are determined by adding estimates calculated on the basis of pre-established reading calendars. These revenues are calculated on the basis of the provisions of the law, of the resolutions of the Authority for electricity and gas and the water system in force during the period, also taking into account the pro tempore equalisation measures in force; it should be noted that with reference to the valorisation of revenues from the transport of electricity, if the admission of investments in tariffs that establishes the right to payment for the operator is virtually certain already in the year in which they are realized, the corresponding revenues they are ascertained on an accrual basis regardless of how they will be financially recognized as a result of ARERA Resolution 654/2015;
- the revenues of the integrated water service are determined on the basis of the Water Tariff Method (MTI-3), valid for the determination of the tariffs for the years 2020-2023, approved with Resolution no. 580/2019/R/idr (MTI-3) of 30 December 2019, Determination 1/2020-DSIS of 29 June 2020 and subsequent modifications by ARERA. Based on the interpretation of the legal nature of the tariff component, Fo.NI. (New Investments Fund) is entered among the revenues for the year the relative amount due to the Water Companies where expressly recognized by the Area Authorities which establish the intended use.
The adjustment for the so-called pass-through items is also entered among the revenues of the year (i.e. electricity, wholesale water) of which the aforementioned resolution provides specific details as well as any adjustment relating to costs pertaining to the Integrated Water System incurred for the occurrence of exceptional events (i.e. water and environmental emergencies) if the preliminary investigation for their recognition gave positive results.
These are recognised when the unconditional right of shareholders is established to receive payment. They are classified in the income statement under the item Investment income.
Contributions obtained for investments in plants, both by public bodies and by private third parties, are recognised at fair value when there is a reasonable certainty that they will be received and that expected conditions will be met. Contributions received for specific plants whose value is recorded under fixed assets are recorded (using the indirect method) among other non-current liabilities and progressively released to the Income Statement in constant instalments over a period equal to the useful life of the reference asset.
Benefits guaranteed to employees disbursed at the time of or after termination of the employment relationship through defined benefit and defined contribution programmes (including: severance indemnity -TFR, extra months, tariff subsidies, as described in the notes) or other long-term benefits are recognised in the period during which the rights to these accrue. The valuation of the liability is carried out by independent actuaries. These funds and benefits are not funded.
The cost of benefits envisaged by the various plans is determined separately for each plan using the actuarial valuation method of the unit credit projection, making the actuarial valuations at the end of each year. Profits and losses deriving from the actuarial calculation are recorded in the statement of comprehensive income, then in a specific Shareholders’ equity Reserve, and are not subsequently charged to the Income Statement.
Expenses deriving from retirement incentives for employees who took part in the “Isopensione” Plan and which meet the criteria defined in the Group’s Plan were recognised in a specific Provision. The Group takes the place of the reference national insurance institutions. In particular, the Provision was created to pay pension instalments due to early pensioners, as well as to pay presumed contributions during the period needed to achieve the right to the relative social security payments through the national insurance institutions.
Goodwill deriving from business combinations (including but not limited to, the acquisition of subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities or the acquisition of business units or other extraordinary transactions) represents the excess of the cost acquisition of the fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary or jointly-controlled entity at the acquisition date compared to the Group’s share of the fair value. Goodwill is recognised as an asset and reviewed annually to verify that it has not suffered any loss in value. If there is joint control, or even affiliated, the goodwill of investments recognised according to the equity method remains implicit in the value of the investment.
The losses in value are recorded immediately in the income statement and are not subsequently restored.
At the acquisition date, any emerging goodwill is allocated to each of the independent cash generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergistic effects deriving from the acquisition. Any loss in value is identified through assessments that refer to the capacity of each unit to generate cash flows to recover the part of goodwill allocated to it. In the event that the recoverable amount by the cash-generating unit is lower than the assigned load value, the relative loss in value is recorded.
In the event of the sale of a subsidiary or jointly controlled entity, the amount not yet amortized of the goodwill attributable to them is included in the determination of the gain or loss on disposal.
This item includes the value of the concession right to the assets consisting of water and purification plants that were transferred. This value refers to state property belonging to the so-called “accidental state” of water and sewage treatment and is systematically amortised based on the residual duration of the concession. It should be noted that the residual depreciation period is in line with the average duration of the operations entrusted with a public procedure.
In line with the provisions of IFRIC 12 “Service Concession Arrangements”, based on the intangible asset model the Group reports the total amount of the physical infrastructure supplied for the management of the water service, since the service concession contract does not give the concessionaire the right to control the use of the public service infrastructure but rather allows access to the management of the infrastructure to provide the public service on behalf of the grantor in accordance with the terms specified in the contract.
In fact, the aforementioned interpretation requires the registration of a single intangible asset representing the concessionaire’s right to charge the fee to users of the public service instead of the takeover of the physical infrastructure for the management of the service.
The amount also includes the capitalisation of the margin resulting from investments.
Costs related to this item are included under intangible assets and are amortized on the basis of a period of presumed usefulness of three / five years.
This item contains assets relative to application of international accounting standard IFRS 16, issued in January 2016 and in effect as of 1 January 2019, which replaced the previous standard on leasing, IAS 17 and its interpretations, identifying criteria for recognition, measurement and presentation, as well as the information to be provided with reference to leasing contracts. IFRS 16 marks the end of the distinction in terms of classification and accounting treatment of operating leases (with off-balance sheet disclosures) and finance leases (recognised in the financial statements).
The right to use the leased asset (“Right of Use”) and the commitment made result from financial data in the financial statements (IFRS 16 applies to all transactions involving a right of use, regardless of the contractual form, i.e. lease, rental or hire purchase). The standard introduces the concept of control to the definition used, in particular, to determine whether a contract is a lease. IFRS 16 requires a lessee to verify whether it has the right to control the use of a given asset for a specified period of time.
There is no accounting symmetry with the lessor, which continues to apply a separate accounting treatment depending on whether the contract is an operating lease or a finance lease (on the basis of current guidelines). On the basis of this new model, the lessee shall recognise:
- in the balance sheet, the assets and liabilities for all leases that have a term exceeding 12 months, unless the underlying asset has a modest value; and
- in profit or loss, depreciation of the leased assets separately from interest on the related liabilities.
For the first-time adoption of the principle, the transition approach used by the Acea Group was the modified retrospective approach, and therefore the contracts whose leases — including renewals — will end within 12 months from the date of first application will not be included. The Group has also used the possibility envisaged by the principle of not accounting separately for the non-lease component of mixed contracts, therefore choosing to treat these contracts as a lease.
For payable discounting purposes, the Group has used an IBR calculated based on a risk-free rate with a maturity equal to the residual duration for each contract plus the credit spread assigned to Acea SpA by Moody’s. Finally, it should be noted that there are no significant differences between the commitments arising from lease contracts discounted at the same rate and the value recognised in accordance with IFRS 16.
Goodwill and other assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortised on a straight-line basis, but are tested for impairment at least once a year by the individual Cash Generating Units (CGUs) or groups of CGUs to which assets with an indefinite useful life can be reasonably allocated, in accordance with Group procedures. The Company analyses the CGUs of the Group identified using its procedure, based on the impairment procedure. The test consists of a comparison between the carrying amount of the asset and its estimated value in use - VIU. Given the nature of the activities carried out by the Acea Group, the method of determining the “VIU” is carried out by discounting the expected cash flows from use and, if significant and reasonably determinable, from disposal at the end of the useful life. However, where there is evidence of a reliable fair value (price traded in an active market, comparable transactions, etc.) the Group assesses the adoption of this value for impairment testing.
Cash flows are determined on the basis of the best information available at the time of the estimate, which can be inferred through the combined use of the financial method and sensitivity analyses. The determination of the “VIU” is carried out using the financial method (Discounted Cash Flow - DCF) which considers the ability to produce cash flows as the fundamental element for the valuation of the entity of reference. The application of the financial method to determine the value in use of a CGU involves estimating the present value of net operating cash flows for tax purposes.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or of a cash-generating unit) is estimated to be lower than the relative book value, it is reduced to the lower recoverable value. An impairment loss is immediately recognised in the Income Statement, unless the asset is represented by land or buildings other than real estate investments recorded at revalued values, in which case the loss is recognised in the respective revaluation reserve. When an impairment no longer exists, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit), with the exception of goodwill, is increased to its new estimated recoverable amount. The reversal must not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of amortisation or depreciation) had no impairment charge been recognised for the asset in prior periods. The reversal of an impairment charge is recognised immediately as income in the income statement, unless the asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal is recognised in the revaluation reserve.
Where an impairment charge is recognised in the income statement, it is included among amortisation, depreciation and impairment charges.
Different accounting policies are applied by the Group to allowances or certificates held for own use in the “Industrial Portfolio”, and those held for trading purposes in the “Trading Portfolio”.
Surplus allowances or certificates held for own use, which are in excess of the company’s requirement in relation to the obligations accruing at the end of the year, are accounted for at cost in other intangible assets. Allowances or certificates assigned free of charge are accounted for at a zero value.
Given that these are assets for instant use, they are not amortised but are tested for impairment. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset’s value in use and its market value.
The burden resulting from the fulfilment of the energy efficiency obligation is estimated on the basis of the average purchase price for the contracts entered into, taking into account the certificates in the portfolio at the financial statements date; a provision for liabilities is allocated for the negative difference between the said burden and the contribution estimated pursuant to AEEGSI Resolution 13/2014/R/efr, to be paid at the time the certificates are delivered in fulfilment of the obligation.
Allowances or certificates held for trading in the “Trading Portfolio” are accounted for in inventories and measured at the lower of purchase cost and estimated realisable value, based on market trends.
Allowances or certificates assigned free of charge are accounted for at a zero value. Market value is established on the basis of any spot or forward sales contracts already signed at the end of the reporting period, or otherwise on the basis of market prices.
The assessment of the recoverability of the financial assets representing debt instruments not valued at fair value with effects on the income statement is made on the basis of the so-called “Expected credit loss model”.
In particular, expected losses are generally determined based on the product of: i) the exposure owed to the counterparty net of the relative mitigating factors (so-called “Exposure at Default”); ii) the probability that the counterparty does not comply with its payment obligation (“Probability of Default”); iii) the estimate in percentage terms of the amount of credit that will not be able to be recovered in the event of a default (“Loss Given Default”), based on past experience and possible recovery actions that can be taken (e.g. out-of-court actions, legal disputes, etc.).
In this regard, the internal ratings already used for the assignment have been adopted to determine the probability of default of the counterparties. For counterparties represented by State Entities and in particular for the National Oil Companies, the probability of default – essentially represented by the probability of late payment – is determined using as input the country risk premiums implemented for the purposes of determining the WACC for the impairment of non-financial assets.
For retail customers not having internal ratings, the assessment of expected losses is based on a provision matrix, constructed where appropriate by grouping the clustered receivables to which write-down percentages apply based on the experience of previous losses, adjusted where necessary to take account of forecast information regarding the credit risk of the counterparty or of clusters of counterparties.
With reference to the application of IFRIC 12 to the public lighting service concession, Acea has adopted the Financial Asset Model, recognising a financial asset to the extent that it has an unconditional contractual right to receive cash flows. In addition, the Group reports revenues on the contract for construction and improvement services, both for the part carried out internally by the Group and for the part of Third Parties. The margin recorded is accounted for according to the provisions of IFRS 15 and amortised over the residual duration of the concession.
Financial liabilities other than derivative instruments – including financial payables, trade payables, other payables and other liabilities – are initially recognised at the fair value less any costs associated with the transaction. Subsequently they are recognised at amortised cost using the effective interest rate for discounting purposes, as illustrated in the previous point “Financial assets”.
Financial liabilities are eliminated when they are extinguished or when the obligation specified in the contract is fulfilled, cancelled or expired.
Derivative financial instruments, including implicit ones (Embedded derivatives) are assets and liabilities recognised at fair value according to the criteria specified in the point below, “Valuation at fair value”.
In the context of the risk management strategy and objectives, qualification of transactions as hedges requires: i) verification of the existence of an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument that can offset the related changes in value, and that this capacity to offset is not affected by the level of counterparty credit risk; ii) the definition of a hedge ratio consistent with risk management objectives, within the defined risk management strategy, where necessary making the appropriate rebalancing actions. Changes in risk management objectives, the absence of the conditions specified above for the classification of transactions as hedges or the implementation of rebalancing operations results in the total or partial prospective discontinuation of the hedge.
When hedging derivatives cover the risk of changes in the fair value of the hedged instruments (fair value hedge; e.g. hedging of the variability of the fair value of fixed rate assets/liabilities), the derivatives are recognised at fair value with the allocation of effects in the income statement. Similarly, the hedged instruments in the income statement reflect the changes in fair value associated with the hedged risk, regardless of the provision of a different valuation criterion generally applicable to the type of instrument.
When derivatives hedge the risk of changes in the cash flows of the hedged instruments (cash flow hedge; e.g. hedging of the variability of the cash flows of assets/liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates or exchange rates), the changes in the fair value of derivatives considered to be effective are initially recognised in the shareholders’ equity reserve relating to the other components of comprehensive income, and subsequently recognised in the income statement consistent with the economic effects produced by the hedged transaction. In the case of hedging of future transactions that involve the recognition of a non-financial asset or liability, the accumulated changes in the fair value of hedging derivatives, recognised in equity, are recognised as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset./non-financial liability subject to hedging (so-called basis adjustment).
The ineffective portion of the hedge is recorded in the income statement item “Financial (costs)/income”.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not meet the conditions to be qualified as hedges, including any ineffective components of hedging derivatives, are recognised in the income statement. In particular, changes in the fair value of non-hedging derivatives on interest rates and currencies are recognised in the income statement item “Financial (costs)/income”.
Embedded derivatives – embedded in financial assets – are not subject to separate accounting. In these cases, the entire hybrid instrument is classified according to the general criteria for the classification of financial assets.
Implicit derivatives incorporated within financial liabilities and/or non-financial assets are separated from the main contract and recognised separately if the embedded instrument: i) meets the definition of a derivative; ii) as a whole it is not measured at fair value with the effects being charged to the income statement (FVTPL); iii) if the characteristics and risks of the derivative are not strictly linked to those of the main contract. Verification of the existence of embedded derivatives to be separated and valued separately is carried out when the company enters into the contract, and subsequently if there are changes in the terms of the contract that lead to significant changes in the cash flows generated by that contract.
Provisions for risks and charges are made when the Group has to meet a current obligation (legal or implicit) deriving from a past event, where it is probable that an outlay of resources will be required to satisfy the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made on the amount of the obligation.
The provisions are allocated based on the Management’s best estimate for the costs required to fulfil the obligation at the balance sheet date, and if the effect is significant.
When the financial effect of time is significant and the payment dates of the obligations can be reliably estimated, the provision is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the average rate of the company’s debt taking into account the risks associated with the obligation; the increase in the provision associated with the passage of time is recognised in the Income Statement under the item “Financial income/(charges)”.
If the debt is related to the dismantling and/or renovation of material assets, the initial fund is reported as an offset to the asset it refers to; its incidence on the Income Statement takes place through the process of amortisation of the material fixed asset to which the obligation refers.
Non-current assets held for sale, disposal groups and discontinued operations whose carrying amount will be recovered mainly through sale rather than through continual use, are measured at the lower of their net carrying amount and the fair value net of costs to sell.
In particular, by disposal group is meant a set of directly related assets and liabilities held for sale in the context of a single operation. Discontinued operations consist, instead, of a significant component of the group, such as an important autonomous business unit or geographical area of activity or a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
This condition is met only when the sale is highly probable, the asset (or group of assets) is available for immediate sale in its current conditions and the Management has made a commitment to the sale, which must take place within twelve months from the date of classification in this item.
Assets and liabilities directly related to non-current assets held for sale, disposal groups and discontinued operations, in line with what is provided for in the international accounting standards, are accounted for in two specific items of the balance sheet, that is, assets held for sale and liabilities closely associated with assets held for sale.
In addition, from the date on which the changed destination of the assets has been resolved, depreciation and amortisation are no longer calculated and the measurement of such assets is made at the lower between historical cost, decreased by the related accumulated depreciation or amortisation, and the estimated realisable value.